![]() ![]() ![]() To say that corrupt means corrupts the ends is to believe in the immaculate conception of ends and principles. He asks of ends only if they are achievable and worth the cost of means. Resources and the possibility of his various choices of actions. He has no other problem he thinks only of his The man of issue views the issue of means and ends in pragmatic and strategic terms. Whenever we think about social change, the question of means and ends arises. What you want, and means is how you get it. That perennial question, "Does the end justify the means?" is meaningless as it stands the real and only question regarding the ethics of means and ends is, and always has been "Does this particular end justify this particular means?" Means-versus-ends is meaningless real arena is bloody ![]() Saul Alinsky in Rules for Radicals, by Saul Alinsky ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |